← Back to abstracts

A Consistent Homogenization Framework for Phase-Field Theory Based on Gurtin's Microforce Balance

Geralf Hütter 1*, Fenil Maganbhai Lathiya1, Vincent von Oertzen 1, Björn Kiefer 1

1 TU Bergakademie Freiberg, Institute of Mechanics and Fluid Dynamics, Germany

Phase-Field, Phase Change & Chemo-Mechanical Microstructure Evolution · C223
Thursday, 3 September 2026, 14:00–14:25 · Chair: Milan Jirásek

Keywords: phase-field theory, computational homogenization, FE²

Phase-field models are a powerful tool for simulating microstructure evolution [1], but their microscopic resolution makes the direct simulation of macroscopic components computationally prohibitive. While two-scale homogenization methods like FE2 are well-established for mechanical problems, a rigorous framework for homogenizing the phase field and its gradient remains an open challenge. Current approaches are often limited to mechanics-only scale coupling or simple mixture rules that neglect gradient energy effects [2]. Even recent mathematically rigorous attempts, such as those using asymptotic expansion for fracture, are restricted in their scope [3], highlighting the need for a more general framework. This work presents a thermodynamically consistent homogenization framework for coupled phase-field problems. Building upon our prior work on phase-morphology kinematics [4], we establish a rigorous kinetic scale transition rooted in Gurtin's microforce theory [5]. Via a formal two-scale expansion of the order parameter, we derive a consistent transfer of the phase field and its gradient from the micro- to the macroscale. This yields a complete set of macroscopic constitutive laws and a macroscopic evolution equation for the homogenized order parameter. The framework's predictive capabilities are demonstrated within a computational two-scale simulation. The implementation leverages a micromorphic DirectFE2 scheme, previously established by the authors [6], to solve macroscopic boundary value problems for which the material response is directly governed by the evolution of the underlying microstructure.

References

  1. I. Steinbach, Phase-field models in materials science, Modell. Simul. Mater. Sci. Eng., 17(7):073001, 2009.
  2. V. de Rancourt, K. Ammar, B. Appolaire, and S. Forest, Homogenization of viscoplastic constitutive laws within a phase field approach, J. Mech. Phys. Solids, 91:239-267, 2016.
  3. P. Ma, X. Liu, X. Luo, S. Li, and L. Zhang, Asymptotic homogenization of phase‐field fracture model: an efficient multiscale finite element framework for anisotropic fracture, Int. J. Num. Meth. Eng., 125(13), 2024.
  4. V. von Oertzen and B. Kiefer, Homogenization of phase transforming materials: the concept of phase-morphology and variable scale separations, J. Mech. Phys. Solids, 185:105561, 2024.
  5. M. E. Gurtin, Generalized Ginzburg-Landau and Cahn-Hilliard equations based on a microforce balance, Phys. D, 92(3-4):178-192, 1996.
  6. A. Malik, G. Hütter, M. Abendroth, and B. Kiefer, Micromorphic FE² simulation of plastic deformations of foam structures, Int. J. Mech. Sci., 265:108883, 2024.